Alternative end game stats (Feature coding #202)
Description
Instead of displaying end game stats per player + separate table for most frags etc, best quadrun etc..
Stats could be displayed in three tables like it is done on the generated stats page http://eql.quakeworld.nu/eql9/mapstats/76
Highscoring player for every column could be highlighted using red text.
Team totals could be displayed like done in q3-osp seen here: http://hem3.passagen.se/aksel/shots/rgb_refrag_dm6_prac_011009.jpg
Related issues
| duplicated by KTX - Feature coding #205: Deaths, Kills and Suicides | Fixed | 08/03/2009 |
History
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
Make it a bit better at being displayed ingame, and adding extra output to be used with a external web server or some sort...
Updated by willgurht over 4 years ago
in an ideal world, the stats.quakeworld.nu would fetch this data also for every game. But maybe that would be CPU heavy.
Giving it a bit thought, I think displaying stats the way it is done on the generated stats page is the best. Easier to compare teams if team-totals are in the separate table. Maybe.. :P
The player-awards i dont see any reason to have in a separate table tho. Just highlight in the suggested ones.
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
- Category set to Core
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
- Target version set to Later versions
Updated by Renzo over 4 years ago
Priority of this will be set to very low priority. There is only so much time to be allocated and we have issues to be resolved before anything else.
ET 3h = actual planning and changes
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
- Due date set to 01/01/2010
- Estimated time set to 3.00
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
- Target version changed from Later versions to 1.37
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
- Priority changed from Low to Normal
Updated by deurk over 4 years ago
We are actually talking about aligning and formatting, not redoing new stuff...
Parsers will be upset though, but it won't be the first time I guess.
Updated by Renzo about 4 years ago
I'm reconsidering this, wondering if this is really worth the effort? Sure, with aligning the stats are more readable but it's not like they are unreadable right now. Should probably be rejected after all.
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
- Status changed from New to On Hold
- Target version deleted (
1.37)
Updated by deurk over 2 years ago
- Target version set to Later versions
Updated by deurk over 2 years ago
Will have a look at that in 1.38
- Assignee set to deurk
- Target version changed from Later versions to 1.38
Updated by deurk over 2 years ago
Had to change that title :)
- Subject changed from alternetive end game stats to Alternative end game stats